Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is much better than Galaxy A20e, having a global score of 81.9 against 74.2. The Google Pixel 4 construction is heavier but just a little thinner than the Galaxy A20e, and they were released with only 7 months difference. The Google Pixel 4 features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A20e has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A20e features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.