Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 296 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's 74.2 general score. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, the HTC One M9 is a noticeably older, somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A20e. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
The HTC One M9 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a greater pixels count per inch in the screen. Galaxy A20e features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20e also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The HTC One M9 counts with a better hardware performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM and the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A20e has a bit longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
The HTC One M9 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 20 megapixels resolution camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.