Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-10 | 2016-03-31 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G5 has an overall score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A20e's 74.2 general score. Even though the LG G5 is much older and heavier than the Galaxy A20e, it's construction is still thinner. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G5 has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G5 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM. The LG G5 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a way greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
LG G5 has a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G5 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A20e features a bit better battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G5 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A20e, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a lot higher video quality and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.