Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. The LG G7 Fit design is a little heavier but a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and both were only released 5 months apart. These phones work with Android OS, but LG G7 Fit has the older 8.1 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little bit bigger screen and a much higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The LG G7 Fit has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A20e, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. The LG G7 Fit takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a camera with a better resolution and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The LG G7 Fit has a battery life that's just as good as the Galaxy A20e one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.