Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e's 74.2 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V10 has 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V10 is a way older, just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A20e.
LG V10 has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot greater pixel quantity per inch of display. Galaxy A20e counts with just a little better processing power than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
LG V10 shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20e, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a camera with more mega pixels. The LG V10 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory.
The LG V10's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A20e.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.