Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than Galaxy A20e's overall score of 74.2. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A20e, but LG was able to make it thinner anyway. These devices include Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG V30S ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a way higher pixels number per inch of screen, a little larger display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a higher 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.