Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A20e's general score of 74.2. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A20e, it's body is still somewhat thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way better pixel number per screen inch. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a much higher video quality, a back camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.