Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20e's 74.2 score. Although the LG V40 ThinQ and Galaxy A20e were only released with a couple of months difference, LG V40 ThinQ's body is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a little bigger display. The LG V40 ThinQ features a better processor than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a way larger diafragm aperture. The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.