Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Galaxy A20e, having a overall score of 87.1 against 74.2. Even though the LG Velvet is extremely heavier than Galaxy A20e, it's a bit thinner and also newer. The LG Velvet features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet counts with a much better display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a better amount of pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. LG Velvet features a much better camera than Galaxy A20e, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a larger camera aperture for better low light images and a much better video resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a way better battery life than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.