Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20e, having a overall score of 89.6 against 74.2. The Motorola edge design is newer, but thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A20e. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola edge counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola edge has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a greater pixels density and a bigger display.
The Motorola edge counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a way better (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture for better low light photography. The Motorola edge counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A20e, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola edge counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.