Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | -- |
| TFT | LTPO |
| 296 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, with a score of 79.2 against 74.2. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a a lot newer and incredibly thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it's also much heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an older 15 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A20e has a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Galaxy A20e counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.