Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, having a 76.4 score against 74.2. Even though the Nokia 9 PureView and the Samsung Galaxy A20e were released with only a couple months difference, Nokia 9 PureView's body is heavier but a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A20e.
Nokia 9 PureView features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a much higher pixel quantity per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Nokia 9 PureView features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 3320mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Nokia 9 PureView takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.