Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than Galaxy A20e, getting a score of 76.2 against 74.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. Nubia Red Magic 5S's construction is newer than Galaxy A20e's, although it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a bigger display, a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a higher pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a superior performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.