Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, having a overall score of 83.8 against 74.2. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and they were released only 1 months apart. Galaxy A50 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater pixel amount per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A50 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Galaxy A50 features better battery performance than Galaxy A20e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.