Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Galaxy A20e's general score of 74.2. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is newer, but just a little thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A20e. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a higher screen density, a quite larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20e, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.