Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A20e's general score of 74.2. Even though Galaxy A70 and the Galaxy A20e were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy A70's design is a little thinner but also heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 3 GB more RAM. Galaxy A70 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a bigger display, a higher pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has more internal storage. The Galaxy A70 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A20e counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A20e also counts with faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.