Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 296 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Galaxy A20e, having a score of 90.8 against 74.2. Galaxy Note 20's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A20e, but it's incredibly heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater display pixels density and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.