Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, with a 79.3 score against 74.2. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it's somewhat heavier and was released 4 years before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy A20e has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower). Galaxy Note 5 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels density and a much better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A20e has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 5's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A20e's battery performance.
Galaxy Note 5 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a back camera with more MP and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.