Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20e, having an 89 score against 74.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and Samsung Galaxy A20e were released with only 5 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is somewhat heavier but also just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A20e.
The Galaxy Note10 features a greater processing power than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note10 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has a better pixels density, a bit larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A20e, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note10 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.