Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-10 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy A20e, with a 93.6 score against 74.2. Although the Galaxy S10 5G and the Galaxy A20e were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy S10 5G body is heavier but just a bit thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a bigger screen, much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a lot bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.