Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. The Galaxy S20 FE design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it's noticeably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.