Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A20e, having a general score of 98 against 74.2. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it's a bit thicker and way heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy A20e, because it has a larger display, a way greater screen density and a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than Galaxy A20e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.