Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than Galaxy A20e's 74.2 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 construction is incredibly newer and a little thinner than Galaxy A20e's, although it's also somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a little larger screen, a greater pixel amount per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy S22 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20e, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A20e, because it has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much better video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.