Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than Galaxy A20e, with a 77.8 score against 74.2. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a incredibly older, heavier and a little bit thicker device. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the older 4.4.2 version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080. Galaxy A20e has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a little faster processor than Galaxy A20e, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a more megapixels back facing camera and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A20e has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.