Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 296 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's overall score of 74.2. Galaxy S9 is a somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A20e, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S9 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S9 also has a much greater display pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Galaxy S9 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S9 also has more RAM. Galaxy S9 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a way bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 112 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S9 and Galaxy A20e count with incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.