Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy A20e, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A20e, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.