Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a global score of 79, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20e's score of 74.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xperia XZ2 Compact has the older 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. Although it's the best device we compare here, the Xperia XZ2 Compact is an older, somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker device than Galaxy A20e.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has more RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A20e, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a much greater screen pixels density.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A20e, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A20e features just a bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.