Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is slightly better than the Galaxy A20e, getting a 78.8 score against 74.2. Xperia Z4v is a notably older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device than Galaxy A20e. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version while Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xperia Z4v features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 CPU cores and a 3 GB RAM memory, the Xperia Z4v also has an additional GPU. The Xperia Z4v has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a much higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Sony Xperia Z4v shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a way better (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A20e counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A20e also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Sony Xperia Z4v's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy A20e.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.