Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a global score of 76.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A20e's overall score of 74.2. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is newer, but incredibly heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy A20e.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e. They have 3 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a slightly better display than Galaxy A20e, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.