Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 296 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20e's 74.2 score. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20e has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a newer device than the Samsung Galaxy A20e, but it is much heavier and a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A20e, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has a better screen pixels density, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A20e, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 32 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20e, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.