Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-05 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a lot better than Galaxy A20s's 77 global score. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max design is newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A20s's, although it is incredibly heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A20s counts with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a much better performance than Galaxy A20s, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much higher 1284 x 2778 resolution, a way greater screen pixels density and a little bit bigger screen.
IPhone 13 Pro Max captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations and a much higher (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A20s has more storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.