Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than Galaxy A20s, getting a general score of 88.1 against 77. Apple iPhone X is an older cellphone than the Galaxy A20s, but it's a little bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. IPhone X has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen. IPhone X has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A20s counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. IPhone X captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.