Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a score of 82, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 overall score. The iPhone XR is better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, we must highlight that it is also older, a little thicker and a bit heavier. Apple iPhone XR features a much better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 828 x 1792 resolution and a quite higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
IPhone XR features a better performing processor than Galaxy A20s, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy A20s has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
IPhone XR features a better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a way bigger sensor and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy A20s features improved battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.