Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is just a bit better than Galaxy A20s, having an 84.2 score against 77. IPhone XS's body is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy A20s, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The iPhone XS counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XS features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a way higher pixel number per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features much more memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
IPhone XS has a superior camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a way higher video definition and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.