Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a global score of 82.5 against 77. Google Pixel 2 XL is a a little bit lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A20s, but both have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A20s. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a way better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a better storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.