Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A20s's score of 77. Google Pixel 3's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A20s, but it's somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A20s. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A20s has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. The Google Pixel 3 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.