Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a overall score of 82.9 against 77. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Google Pixel 4 XL is a just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A20s. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A20s has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.