Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 score. The Google Pixel 4a construction is newer and lighter, but also a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A20s. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 4a takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A20s has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.