Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 264 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20s's overall score of 77. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is older and thicker than the Galaxy A20s, it's body is still lighter. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11.
The HTC One M9 features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way better amount of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
HTC One M9 features a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with way more MP.
Galaxy A20s counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.