Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | S-LCD 5 |
| 264 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a score of 77 against 77. Galaxy A20s is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but they are 0.31inches thick. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A20s and HTC U Ultra feature extremely similar CPUs, and although the HTC U Ultra has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount. HTC U Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra has a superior camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A20s has longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.