Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s is slightly better than LG G7 Fit, getting a 77 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy A20s's design has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it's heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A20s has the older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The LG G7 Fit's processing unit is very similar to Galaxy A20s's CPU, and although the LG G7 Fit has lesser cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM. The LG G7 Fit features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 Fit has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A20s counts with better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G7 Fit has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.