Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 general score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this comparison review, LG G8X ThinQ's design is a little heavier and a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A20s.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A20s's battery duration. LG G8X ThinQ has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have the same aperture, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.