Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, having an 82.5 score against 77. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, but LG managed to build it a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11, providing lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better screen pixels density and a way better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better camera than Galaxy A20s, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot better video definition, a larger aperture and a camera with a higher resolution. LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.