Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A20s's score of 77. LG V35 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A20s, despite of the fact that it was released only 16 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixel quantity per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera with a better resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A20s has longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.