Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 overall score. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older phone than Samsung Galaxy A20s, but it's a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. These devices include Android operating system, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen density and a lot higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V40 ThinQ features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy A20s counts with improved battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.