Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A20s, with a overall score of 80.9 against 77. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's, but it is just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11, counting with some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy A20s has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A20s, because it has a higher display pixels density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A20s has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a way better video definition and a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.