Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A20s's general score of 77. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is notably newer than the Galaxy A20s, it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, so it provides some additional features.
The Galaxy A20s has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher pixels amount per inch of display and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a back camera with way more megapixels, a way larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.