Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy A20s's 77 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is newer than the Galaxy A20s's, but it's a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a better screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A20s features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a larger camera aperture, a much more MP back camera and a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.