Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A20s is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with a 77 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A20s is a thinner and a little lighter phone than Motorola Moto G Power, although both were released only a couple of months apart. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Motorola Moto G Power has just a little better performance than Galaxy A20s. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2300 resolution.
The Moto G Power captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture, a much higher video resolution and a camera with a better resolution. Samsung Galaxy A20s and Moto G Power have quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have the same internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Power counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.