Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-05 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 264 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A20s is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, having a score of 77 against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy A20s's body is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a CPU that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy A20s, both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Moto Z3 Play features a better display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a lot better display density. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A20s has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.